United States President Donald Trump delivered a strongly nationalistic inaugural address on Monday, emphasizing his commitment to reshaping America’s trade system. Sworn in as the 47th president, Trump declared plans to impose tariffs and taxes on foreign imports to protect U.S. workers and families.
Bold Trade Overhaul Promised
Donald Trump proclaimed, “Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.” His administration aims to adopt an “America First Trade Policy” with measures to overhaul trade relations and secure economic gains for the U.S.
The president had previously proposed tariffs of 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico and an additional 10% on Chinese goods, citing concerns over illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking. While Trump stopped short of unveiling specific new tariffs on Monday, he reaffirmed his commitment to trade reforms.
External Revenue Service and Department of Government Efficiency
In a dramatic move, Donald Trump announced plans to establish an “External Revenue Service” to collect tariffs and duties from foreign imports, promising “massive amounts of money” flowing into the U.S. economy.
Additionally, Trump revealed the creation of a “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) aimed at cutting $1 trillion in federal spending. The office will be led by Tesla CEO Elon Musk and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, whose roles are expected to bring both advisory and political clout.
Economic Implications and Reactions
While some analysts warn that Donald Trump’s tariff-driven policies may result in higher consumer prices and slower GDP growth, his supporters argue that other measures, such as tax cuts and deregulation, could offset these effects.
Trump’s Treasury secretary nominee, Scott Bessent, told lawmakers last week that he disagreed with claims that tariff costs would primarily burden U.S. consumers.
As the Trump administration moves forward, the global and domestic implications of these bold economic policies remain a subject of significant debate.
