• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lifestyle
Court Adjourns Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Defamation Trial to December 1

Court Shifts Natasha’s Cybercrime Trial to February 2026

November 24, 2025
Tinubu Decorates Tunji Disu As Acting IGP

Tinubu Set To Swear In Disu As IGP Wednesday

March 2, 2026
BREAKING: El-Rufai Charged By FG Over Alleged NSA Phone Interception

El-Rufai Family Denies ICPC Claims of Phone-Tapping Equipment, Labels Raid Politically Motivated

March 2, 2026
Lagos APC Tells Opposition To Focus On Party Reforms, Not Electoral Act

Lagos APC Congress Scheduled for Tuesday

March 2, 2026
Driver Arrested After Fatal Collision Kills Motorcyclist, Passenger In Lagos

Lagos Announces Major Traffic Diversions Ahead of Road Reconstruction

March 2, 2026
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Adverts
Tuesday, March 3, 2026
  • Login
Kemi Ashefon Love Haven
  • News
  • Dear Kemi
  • Intimacy
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • Sport
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Dear Kemi
  • Intimacy
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • Sport
No Result
View All Result
Kemi Ashefon Love Haven
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

Court Shifts Natasha’s Cybercrime Trial to February 2026

Ayobami Owolabi by Ayobami Owolabi
3 months ago
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Court Adjourns Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Defamation Trial to December 1
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Federal High Court in Abuja has postponed the trial of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who is facing a six-count cybercrime charge, setting a new date of February 4, 2026, for proceedings to begin.

The case had been slated for hearing on Monday before Justice Mohammed Umar, but it was unable to proceed due to the judge’s absence.

This is not the first delay, as a previous sitting scheduled for October 21 was also stalled following a protest led by activist Omoyele Sowore calling for the release of Nnamdi Kanu, recently convicted of terrorism-related offences.

REAS ALSO:

  • Tinubu Set To Swear In Disu As IGP Wednesday
  • El-Rufai Family Denies ICPC Claims of Phone-Tapping Equipment, Labels Raid Politically Motivated
  • Lagos APC Congress Scheduled for Tuesday
  • Lagos Announces Major Traffic Diversions Ahead of Road Reconstruction
  • Shanko Rasheed’s Wife Breaks Down, Alleges Neglect, Abuse After Son’s Death

Justice Umar had originally fixed October 21 after the trial was halted on September 22 when the defence raised an objection.

Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on June 30 on charges filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Mohammed Abubakar, after which she was granted bail and the matter adjourned to September 22 for trial commencement.

On that date, the prosecution—represented by David Kaswe—was set to open its case and call the first witness. A television screen had already been mounted in the courtroom in preparation for the presentation of evidence. However, defence counsel Ehiogie West-Idahosa objected, informing the court that he had filed a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

He argued that the objection was based not on the nature of the charges, but on what he described as an abuse of the Attorney-General of the Federation’s prosecutorial powers. West-Idahosa also protested that he had not been served with the prosecution witness statements.

Although Kaswe urged the court to proceed with the day’s business, Justice Umar ruled that the prosecution must first address the preliminary objection. The judge insisted that the matter would not move forward until the objection was determined.

In the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan is accused of disseminating false and harmful information electronically with the intent to incite, endanger lives, damage reputations and disturb public order. The allegations stem from comments she reportedly made on April 4 in Ihima, Kogi State, where she accused Senate President Godswill Akpabio of directing former Governor Yahaya Bello to have her killed. She is also alleged to have repeated the claims during a television interview.

The prosecution says the alleged offences contravene the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act 2024.

Tags: Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan
Kemi Ashefon Love Haven

Copyright © 2024 Kemi Ashefon Love Haven.

Navigate Site

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Kemi Ashefon Love Haven.