• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lifestyle
Farouk Lawan Vs Femi Otedola’s $500K Bribe: Appeal Court Orders Legislator Back To High Court

Farouk Lawan Vs Femi Otedola’s $500K Bribe: Appeal Court Orders Legislator Back To High Court

October 9, 2024
Obi Supporters May Be His Downfall In 2027 Elections – Dabiri-Erewa

NiDCOM Tells Nigerians In South Africa: ‘Close Shops, Stay Safe’ As Xenophobia Spreads

April 24, 2026
Military Sets Up Court-Martial To Try 36 Personnel Over Alleged Coup Plot

Military Sets Up Court-Martial To Try 36 Personnel Over Alleged Coup Plot

April 24, 2026
Davido’s Father Leads Donation With N500m To Osun Security Fund

Davido’s Father Leads Donation With N500m To Osun Security Fund

April 24, 2026
APC Unveils New 2027 Election Schedule, Changes Primary Dates

APC Unveils New 2027 Election Schedule, Changes Primary Dates

April 24, 2026
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Adverts
Friday, April 24, 2026
  • Login
Kemi Ashefon Love Haven
  • News
  • Dear Kemi
  • Intimacy
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • Sport
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Dear Kemi
  • Intimacy
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • Sport
No Result
View All Result
Kemi Ashefon Love Haven
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Entertainment

Farouk Lawan Vs Femi Otedola’s $500K Bribe: Appeal Court Orders Legislator Back To High Court

Kemi Ashefon by Kemi Ashefon
6 years ago
in Entertainment, General, Lifestyle, News, Politics
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Farouk Lawan Vs Femi Otedola’s $500K Bribe: Appeal Court Orders Legislator Back To High Court
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered former House of Representatives member, Farouk Lawan to return to the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to defend himself in the $500,000 bribery case pending against him.

In a judgment on Tuesday a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal was unanimous in dismissing Lawan’s appeal for lacking in merit.

The appellate court upheld the October 17, 2019 ruling by Justice Angela Otaluka of the High Court of the FCT, rejecting Lawan’s no-case submission.

Justice Peter Ige, who read the lead judgment of the Court of Appeal, held that, as against the appellant’s claim, there was no injustice occasioned against Lawan by Justice Otaluka’s ruling ordering him to enter his defence in the trial.

Justice Ige resolved the four issues, distilled for determination in the appeal, against the appellant.

The judge said: “I have also read the records of appeal, particularly the evidence of PW1 to PW5, the ruling of the High Court and the argument of parties to this appeal and I am of the firm view that the review of the evidence by the lower court was not slanted in favour of the prosecution against the appellant.

“The lower court was expected to be brief in its analysis of the evidence at the stage of the no-case submission. In any event, what calls for examination on a no-case submission is whether there’s any evidence from the prosecution, no matter how slant, linking the defendant with the commission of the offences for which he was charged and whether the evidence linking the defendant has been discredited during cross-examination.

“The trial court is also called upon, at the no-case submission stage, to find out f the evidence or ingredients of the offences for which the defendant s charged have been established and not to go into any elaborate or extensive review of evidence of witnesses

“The lower court was right in its decision, calling on the appellant to enter his defence.”

Lawan is being prosecuted by the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) for allegedly collecting 500,000 dollars part of a $3 million bribe.

The ex-lawmaker was alleged to have demanded money to facilitate the removal of Otedola’s company, Zenon Oil, from the list of firms indicted by the House of Representatives’ Ad-hoc Committee which probed fuel subsidy abuse in 2012, which Lawan was the Chairman.

The prosecution called five witnesses and closed its case, following which Lawan made a no-case submission, which was rejected in a ruling by Justice Otaluka on October 17, 2010.

Rather than entering his defence, as ordered by the trial court, Lawan, through his lawyer, Mike Ozekhome (SAN) appealed the ruling, which appealed was dismissed by the Appeal Court on Tuesday, for lacking in merit.

Kemi Ashefon Love Haven

Copyright © 2024 Kemi Ashefon Love Haven.

Navigate Site

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Kemi Ashefon Love Haven.